Add workaround for Python 2.6's HTTPBasicAuthHandler deficiencies

[hodgestar]

The fix for  Python issue 3819 introduced an  infinite recursion bug into Python 2.6.x that is triggered by attempting to connect using Basic authentication with a bad username and/or password. This class fixes the problem using the simple solution outlined in  a comment on issue 8797.

[hodgestar]

Work around for Python 2.6 HTTPBasicAuthHandler issues.

[osimons]

Nice. Patch reads well, and certainly looks like good research.

I've been staring at the source though, and I'm not sure a general compat is the right place to put it. With current layout, all slave-connection code is in slave.py. I think it makes sense to keep this one there too.

However, if you want to get a compat module going, it would be better to add it as bitten.util.compat - and keep the shared code in a location that is naturally available to both master and slave. If not the patch would also need to add the new top-level file to MANIFEST-SLAVE.in.

Anyway, +1 on comitting this code for 0.6.

[hodgestar]

Replying to osimons:

I've been staring at the source though, and I'm not sure a general compat is the right place to put it. With current layout, all slave-connection code is in slave.py. I think it makes sense to keep this one there too.

My feeling was that slave.py is getting rather long and sprouting too many helper class. Perhaps now is not the best time to start cleaning that up though.

However, if you want to get a compat module going, it would be better to add it as bitten.util.compat - and keep the shared code in a location that is naturally available to both master and slave. If not the patch would also need to add the new top-level file to MANIFEST-SLAVE.in.

Ah. I missed that. bitten.util.compat is a better than bitten.compat then.

Anyway, +1 on comitting this code for 0.6.

Cool. If I don't get feedback from the original reporter soon I'll arrange to do my testing of the behaviour before and after the patch.

[wormyourhonor@…]

Replying to hodgestar:

Replying to osimons:

I've been staring at the source though, and I'm not sure a general compat is the right place to put it. With current layout, all slave-connection code is in slave.py. I think it makes sense to keep this one there too.

My feeling was that slave.py is getting rather long and sprouting too many helper class. Perhaps now is not the best time to start cleaning that up though.

However, if you want to get a compat module going, it would be better to add it as bitten.util.compat - and keep the shared code in a location that is naturally available to both master and slave. If not the patch would also need to add the new top-level file to MANIFEST-SLAVE.in.

Ah. I missed that. bitten.util.compat is a better than bitten.compat then.

Anyway, +1 on comitting this code for 0.6.

Cool. If I don't get feedback from the original reporter soon I'll arrange to do my testing of the behaviour before and after the patch.

I, the original reporter, have verified my test case, invalid credentials:

• FAIL using bitten-0.6.x@r969 - max recursion depth problem
• PASS using patched bitten-0.6.x@r969. I receive "HTTP Error 401: Authorization Required".

For S&Gs, an unauthorized user with valid credentials exits normally with or without the patch, "HTTP Error 403: Forbidden"

[hodgestar]

Replying to wormyourhonor@…:

I, the original reporter, have verified my test case, invalid credentials: * FAIL using bitten-0.6.x@r969 - max recursion depth problem * PASS using patched bitten-0.6.x@r969. I receive "HTTP Error 401: Authorization Required". For S&Gs, an unauthorized user with valid credentials exits normally with or without the patch, "HTTP Error 403: Forbidden"

Woot. Thanks!

[hodgestar]

Patch committed in r974 and backported to 0.6.x in r975. The only change from the attached patch was moving bitten.compat to bitten.util.compat as suggested by osimons.